Nicole Kidman Discusses The Baby Bump Rumors

November 21st, 2008

bump

 

Nicole Kidman recently shared that she may scale back her movie career to focus on having more babies. And there has been some speculation that she may already be expecting again!

“No, I just have a little tummy,” insisted Nicole, 41, – whose form-fitting dress had some bloggers speculating about a possible “baby bump” at Tuesday’s premiere of her new film, Australia. She laughingly adds, “My god, I just had a baby four months ago – give me a break!” 

Nicole made the declaration Friday, when she called in to the “Kyle and Jackie O Show” on Sydney’s 2DAY F.M. 

“I think I’ve always had a little tummy, though, it runs in the family,” shared Nicole. “My sister does, my mum does, my grandmother did …. We affectionately refer to it as the ‘little tummy.’ “ 

Nicole also gushed about her new daughter, Sunday Rose, with husband Keith Urban. “I’m just completely besotted with her,” Nicole said. “She was singing up a storm this morning …. She’s just discovered her voice. She’s high and low. Other people may call it screaming – but not to me!”

Splash News Online & Source


Entry Filed under: Nicole Kidman

BE THE FIRST TO KNOW!

Join the Babyrazzi email news update list below and we'll email you every time there's a new post on Babyrazzi.

Your privacy is safe with Babyrazzi. We will not share your info.



24 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Nastaran  |  November 21st, 2008 at 1:59 pm

    ALITTLE TUMMY!!!!!????
    AND WHY DOES SHE WEAR LIKE THIS DRESS, WHEN
    SHE IS’NT FIT AND HER TUMMY IS LIKE A FLOWER IN
    THE DESERT????

  • 2. Honey  |  November 21st, 2008 at 2:09 pm

    Yeah, she’s really unfit, #1. Come on! She is SO tiny, and unfortunately for tiny people, if they carry any weight it’s usually in their stomachs. I think this must be a bad angle or something, because I have seen many pictures of her since her baby was born and there wasn’t a trace.

  • 3. Just me  |  November 21st, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    I was thinking the same thing you guys!!
    It’s just a skin-tight dress!! There are some clothes that even stick-thin people shouldn’t wear.
    And I don’t think Nicole should address the rumors by saying she has a tummy and that it runs in her family … SHE HAS NO TUMMY!!! She’s 5-11 and probably weighs 130!!

  • 4. Lauren  |  November 21st, 2008 at 2:44 pm

    Who cares! She just had a baby and there’s already rumors that she’s pregnant again. Not everyone can lose the baby weight so fast! Sheesh..

  • 5. Eli  |  November 21st, 2008 at 3:26 pm

    I really like the hair ornament Nicole is wearing.

  • 6. Lets have some Baby Talk&hellip  |  November 21st, 2008 at 3:30 pm

    [...] Baby Razzi is reporting Nicole Kidman’s reaction to the pregnancy rumors. Come on folks she just gave birth. By the way, no she isn’t pregnant [...]

  • 7. laila  |  November 21st, 2008 at 3:34 pm

    #1 Would like to see your figure. Nicole is very tall and very slim she just had a baby and still has a bit of a tummy. She’s probably 1/2 your size so please don’t make such inconsiderate comments.

  • 8. Niloofar  |  November 21st, 2008 at 3:56 pm

    LAILA….
    I SHOULD SAY THAT NASTARAN=NILOOFAR…..
    THAT WAS TYPO…….!!!!! AND MY SISTER’S FAULT…..

    ANYWAY……….YOU KNOW THAT HOW OLD AM I ????
    I’M SLIM AND REALLY FIT………..
    AND I JUST TOLD MY OPINION………..
    I LOVE NICOLE LIKE U,TOO…….. :))))))))))))))

  • 9. Zoe  |  November 21st, 2008 at 7:51 pm

    She hardly looks un-fit to me.

  • 10. Zbella  |  November 21st, 2008 at 8:57 pm

    She looks great. Little tummy and all.

  • 11. kt  |  November 21st, 2008 at 10:09 pm

    i love her tummy! she looks lovely! i do have to say though that that doesn’t look like a tummy that is just natural, it looks like a pregnancy!

  • 12. Cindy  |  November 21st, 2008 at 10:54 pm

    Poor Nicole. I think she looks great, I would have been thrilled to look this good after giving birth just four months ago!

  • 13. Sarah  |  November 22nd, 2008 at 9:33 am

    I really hate that it’s getting to the point where if a woman has and sort of a belly at all she ends up on the front of a tabloid. What are we teaching our daughters?

  • 14. KTZQT4U  |  November 22nd, 2008 at 5:54 pm

    Sarah, i agree it is sad. However, that being said i have to say seeing her right after the baby and now this does look like it could be pregnancy. Based on how she’s carrying the weight. This comes from me and i had my boys a year and four days apart. I went back to within a couple of pounds of my pre-baby body after the first really quickly too. And i’m only 5′2″ and 105 LBS. Either way she looks great #1.

  • 15. suki  |  November 25th, 2008 at 6:07 pm

    Dont think that Nicole is the type to sweat it out in the gym anyway, she’s 41 (?) and as you get older it takes longer to loose body fat, especially after a baby. Dont blame her for saying, ‘ give me a break, its only been 4 months’.

  • 16. oatmealfairy  |  December 17th, 2008 at 7:21 am

    She wasn’t that big when she was pregnant with #1. Why would we believe it’s just a little left over belly, then?

  • 17. Christi  |  February 5th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    I love you Nicole! Beautiful as always—I weight 115 and I tell you she looks great!

  • 18. lyndy  |  April 10th, 2009 at 8:27 pm

    stunning as usual ,doesnt matter what she wears ,always looks amazing

  • 19. skydancer  |  April 21st, 2009 at 11:17 pm

    I wish that’s all the tummy I had!! Nicole is a beautiful woman, with or without a little tummy. So all you mean people…give it up!!!!

  • 20. kate  |  May 5th, 2009 at 7:38 am

    Does it really matter?
    PS She does work out?

  • 21. cheryl  |  May 14th, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    hi desperate to find a picture of nicole from last scene of moulin rouge daughter wants her dress remade for her wedding. Any ideas anyone

  • 22. Paula  |  May 17th, 2009 at 10:56 am

    Ha. I guess since it is May 09 and she still hasn’t gotten any larger that should put all you rumor starters to rest. The picture looks great. We all should look so good. The only thing I can figure is that some people are just not happy unless they can find fault.

  • 23. Marla Tsinajinnie  |  June 19th, 2009 at 7:51 pm

    Will,she really pretty that she had a baby girl.

  • 24. 2scent  |  June 24th, 2009 at 12:01 am

    Nicole is a goddess! Nevertheless, I find it hard to believe that she birthed a baby at all. She never looked pregnant to my eyes, even though she had a “baby bump”; those can be fabricated. Days after giving birth, she didn’t look like a woman who had just given birth. She was out and about having a Starbucks with hubby, Keith, looking a svelt as ever.

    I think she doesn’t want her baby to be seen, because the baby was birthed by a surrogate, and having Sunday Rose out there, would only bring further attention to this baby.

Leave a Comment

Better yet, come join the fun at our NEW hangout hellorazzi.com where we celebrate motherhood, beauty and friendship. At hellorazzi.com you can meet friends, share the latest gossip, exchange beauty secrets, create your own blog, gab in the forums; and enjoy the warmth of spirited girl talk. Come on in! It's free.

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Choose Your Celebrity:

Most Recent Posts

Feeds

Our Sponsors:


Advertise on blogs

Your Ad Here




Make Babyrazzi.com Your Homepage