Michelle Williams & Heath Ledger At Family Wedding
December 30th, 2006
Michelle looks soooo beautiful!
Heath Ledger and Michelle Williams were snapped in Australia just before Christmas. They were there to attend Heath’s father’s wedding. The couple arrived in a stretch limo at the waterfront venue in Perth. Heath and Michelle may be heading to the altar soon themselves as they were allegedly spotted picking up a marriage license at City Hall in NYC a month or so ago. They have a one-year-old daughter Matilda Rose. Matilda’s godfather is Jake Gyllenhaal!
Entry Filed under: other celebrity moms
22 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Better yet, come join the fun at our NEW hangout hellorazzi.com where we celebrate motherhood, beauty and friendship. At hellorazzi.com you can meet friends, share the latest gossip, exchange beauty secrets, create your own blog, gab in the forums; and enjoy the warmth of spirited girl talk. Come on in! It's free.Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1. alaina mackenzie | December 31st, 2006 at 12:06 am
just lovely
2. honey | December 31st, 2006 at 4:34 am
Is she ever thin! I’m glad to see they’re still together. I don’t know much about either one of them but they seem to be a perfect fit.
3. Kellymay | December 31st, 2006 at 1:46 pm
They look great! I wonder when/if they’ll tie the knot soon? I love that these two hate the press, more pics of them flashing the bird then smiling!
4. tam | January 1st, 2007 at 4:50 am
She looks way too skinny! =/
5. Mumba | January 1st, 2007 at 7:49 am
I agree, eat something woman!
6. shirley&Laverne | January 1st, 2007 at 2:55 pm
she does not look soooooooooo beautiful like the webmisstress gushes. she looks awfully pale and skinny, and her posture is awful too.
uggh the lack of imagination for the captions is so annoying, I don’t even know why I clicked on this webpage again.
7. Jane | January 1st, 2007 at 4:35 pm
Michelle soooo beautiful?! Please…she looks like a 12 year old girl. She looked much better after the birth of her daughter when she was still carrying some baby weight. And flashing the “bird” at photogs? Nice example they’re setting for their daughter.
8. Karina | January 1st, 2007 at 7:50 pm
YUCK SHE LOOKS LIKE SHE NEEDS A TAN AND A SANDWICH OR MAYBE TWO!!!!!!!
9. Diana | January 2nd, 2007 at 10:38 am
I think she is beautiful, but she does need to eat a little more. She looks a little gaunt and pale in these pictures. x
10. Essie | January 2nd, 2007 at 11:28 am
First of all, not everybody needs or wants to be tan!! Perhaps she is being cautious BECAUSE her skin is pale!!! She is also a petite woman. What . . . you people want her to gain 50 pounds so she looks “healthy”? Idiotic!!! The woman looks great. Leave her alone.
As for giving photogs the bird . . . great!! Ruin their pictures. That are intruders anyway.
11. Meg | January 2nd, 2007 at 3:15 pm
She is not by nature ” a petite woman”. If you recall Dawson’s Creek she was more healthy looking. Now she’s hit the Hollywood trend of straving herself.
12. Shea | January 2nd, 2007 at 5:21 pm
I also think she looks like shes 12 yrs old. she was ALOT heavier when she was on dawsons creek. those pictures of her and heath fingering the cameras were funny but not as funny as her one piece little girls bathing suit. Heath looked like a perv in those pics with her. she doesnt look good here at all either.
13. BC Girl | January 2nd, 2007 at 5:22 pm
I do think that Michelle is very pretty and cute. But I do agree with you Meg, she was alot more ‘healthy’ looking in Dawsons Creek, now she is way tooo skinny. But then again, if she did gain a few pounds everyone would harass her about being ‘fat’ because she isnt a toothpick like the rest of Hollywood.
14. tam | January 2nd, 2007 at 6:19 pm
I agree with #11
15. jessica | January 3rd, 2007 at 12:12 am
Michelle looks like she is trying to hold up an oversized pillowcase. She doesn’t look beautiful to me…and Jane, you are correct. Giving someone the “bird” is a real immature thing to do and not a very good example for their child.
16. Mumba | January 3rd, 2007 at 12:32 pm
Defo agree she did look much healthier in Dawsons Creek, I dont think she is naturally ‘petite’ as a previous post claimed, I think her appearance now is the result of unhealthy dieting. just MHO tho
17. Mumba | January 3rd, 2007 at 12:43 pm
And in other news
Britney Spears ‘collapses’ at News Years party…
http://perezhilton.com/topics/britney_spears/britney_collapses_at_her_new_years_party_20070101.php
18. MissyMama | January 4th, 2007 at 4:59 pm
She is WAY too skinny! She looked so good when she was on Dawsons Creek, she was even “too” skinny in Brokeback Mountain.
Anyhoo, they seem (look) happy together. I wish them the best.
19. Tigigirl | January 8th, 2007 at 3:14 am
You people sure are critical! You should know something of what you are commenting on. I met Michelle when she was filming on “Dawson’s Creek”. She was very young and had “softness” to her frame. But, in person, she was very petite and wore a size 1! She just looked heavier because she was only about 5′1″ or 5′2″. Katie was a size1 as well. But, she was 5′9″. The camera really does add 10 pounds. Michelle is a very sweet person and I’m glad she is happy!
20. You're homophobic | January 8th, 2007 at 8:31 pm
Did anyone else notice that she’s wearing white to a wedding?
Poor, poor etiquette, just awful. Let the bride stand out, will you?
21. Laura | September 18th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
RIP Heath your misssed :( you were one of the best.. to matilda and michelle all the best
22. Rebeca | October 9th, 2008 at 8:56 pm
what a nice pic .
michelle looks pretty